AI Judge

Benchmark lab

AI Judge

One bundle. Three independent judges. Reproducible rankings.

A single-operator instrument for honest model comparison — streamed answers, deterministic validators, seeded blind judge panels, durable SQLite records.

Methodology

01

Bundle

One immutable, versioned prompt bundle — 1–5 typed tasks. Same input for every model, forever.

02

Stream

Candidates answer live over OpenRouter. Deterministic validators check JSON, counts, word limits and known answers first.

03

Judge ×3

A seeded blind panel of three judges scores each answer at temperature 0. Candidate identity is never revealed.

04

Rank

Median of judge overalls per task, then averaged across tasks. Scored runs enter the board, including incomplete ones with penalties. Cancelled runs never do.

Current standings

coding-sample

Full leaderboard →
Top models on coding-sample
RankModelMedian
—~anthropic/claude-opus-latestPROVISIONAL10.0
—deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813PROVISIONAL9.9
—openai/gpt-5.6-luna-proPROVISIONAL9.9
—~anthropic/claude-sonnet-latestPROVISIONAL9.8
—deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731PROVISIONAL9.8
Median of complete bundle-run scores · provisional < 3 complete runs · score 10.0 leader

Why it is honest

Blind judging

Judge prompts contain only the task and the raw answer — never the model's name, provider, or metadata.

Seeded panels

Each category gets one deterministic 3-judge panel per run, persisted with its seed and reserve order. Fully reproducible.

Deterministic validators

Objective checks — schema, counts, word limits, known math answers — run before judging and are shown separately, never blended away.

coding-sample · hash 2d64fc9d189d…Single-operator benchmark lab · SQLite WAL · temperature-0 judging